The idea of converged infrastructure revolves around forming a single optimized IT package by putting together several components to meet present-day business needs. According to HP, converged infrastructure meets these needs “by bringing storage, servers, networking, and management together – simply engineered to work as one.” The end result is interoperability of IT components using resource pools based on a common platform. Convergence embraces all target resources in one shot, not on a piecemeal basis.
Network performance, supported by uniform applications and resources, is critical for making infrastructure convergence work; this is especially true for convergence implemented in a virtual environment. Virtualization, as the experts tell us, is the starting point of convergence. There is one interesting observation regarding the relationship between networking and convergence: although the network may be a target for convergence, it is at the same time the “connecting tissue” that binds the physical resources to the central abstraction upon which virtualization is based.
However successful convergence also depends on other factors, such as the continuing evolution of NaaS (Network as a Service, which is a cloud service) and SDN (software defined networking).
Infrastructure convergence can be achieved at the network and cloud levels. In fact, the evolution of the cloud has helped make the idea of fully converged infrastructure a reality. The cloud creates the need for abstraction of certain IT components such as servers, storage systems and network connections into virtual resources. Users manage these virtual abstractions through APIs (application programming interfaces). Using the network, the APIs distribute resources from a pool of various hardware elements to applications.
NaaS is a concept founded on two network missions created by the cloud: one, to connect the items comprising the resource pool collectively called the cloud: application, compute, and storage elements; and two, to support the connectivity needed by applications.
SDN is a service to support the need of NaaS. Three approaches to SDN have been developed: virtual overlay network (a.k.a. SDN overlay network), centrally controlled SDN, and non-centrally-controlled SDN.
In simple terms, the virtual overlay network allows NaaS to substitute for a traditional VPN (virtual private network). This is also a multi-tenant model that has partitioned services for all users and applications.
Centrally-controlled SDN enables a software controller using the OpenFlow protocol to manage network traffic by creating appropriate rules in every device. All aspects of traffic management and connectivity are directed by software.
The non-centrally-controlled SDN model seeks to achieve the benefits of OpenFlow-based SDN minus the burden of a control function to direct all connections and traffic. Instead of focusing on changes in network technology, this model prefers APIs for software control. By building on current network practices and protocols, this model can converge existing network devices into future SDNs.
Market observers have noted indications that a unified SDN that includes the three models mentioned has already been in the works.
At the expense of legacy data centers focused on applications, many IT organizations are joining the recent bandwagon headed for virtualization and enticing cloud offerings like ITaaS (IT as a service) that have taken center stage in current technology infrastructures. As a result, these organizations are facing new storage-related challenges brought about by server virtualization, unpredictable heavy workloads, and large-scale consolidation of IT hardware inherent in the new technologies.
The trend toward explosive growth that has replaced stable growth patterns in former computing environments is itself another challenge, and it calls for corresponding update of IT infrastructure, including storage. The slower pace of change that used to characterize IT not too long ago is gone. The speed at which change is now taking place has made it difficult for IT leaders to forecast service levels, to make buy-versus-repurpose decisions, to anticipate the effects of new applications on the response times of older ones, and to determine the organization’s ability to migrate applications as rapidly as they grow.
When it comes to storage, legacy infrastructures have disconnected platforms resulting in interoperability issues and they are too complex. The storage environments of some companies are fragmented, resulting in numerous problems and inefficiencies. In addition, many existing storage systems are practically isolated into silos and are excessively rigid. To meet the exponential demands of new virtualization and cloud technologies, storage systems need to be modernized.
Hewlett-Packard has a solution package for this, HP Converged Storage, which can be ideal for the modern environments where virtualization and cloud services have dominance. This package includes a product called HP 3PAR StoreServ built on modern flash-optimized storage architecture. HP says that this solution “delivers sustainable performance for diverse and unpredictable workloads that scales even with extremely high levels of capacity utilization.”
Another product included in the package is HP StoreFabricStorage which is designed to meet the needs of networking infrastructure. Offering FC (Fibre Channel) connectivity between servers and storage, this product complements HP 3PAR StoreServ.
If you are planning to modernize your storage using the HP solution package described here or an alternative product, in preparation for migration into virtualization and the cloud, you can always seek the assistance of Key4ce IT Professionals for charting your direction.